Ro-Ro container ships, also known as “roll-on/roll-off vessels,” are designed to load and unload semi-trailers, vehicles, and wheeled pallets directly via a hinged stern ramp connecting to the quay. This design eliminates the need for cranes, enabling efficient loading and unloading through tractors or chassis.

These vessels typically adopt a multi-deck flat structure without transverse bulkheads, and the decks are interconnected by ramps or elevators. They are capable of carrying containers, vehicles, and oversized cargo, making them highly versatile for short-sea and coastal transport. However, despite their flexibility, Ro-Ro container ships face several limitations that have prevented them from being widely adopted compared with fully cellular container ships.

Advantages of Ro-Ro Container Ships

Limitations Affecting Adoption

  1. Ramp slope restrictions
    The efficiency of Ro-Ro ships depends on the slope of the ramp. For loaded container trailers, the safe working slope is generally around . If the tide creates a steeper slope, trailers struggle to move on or off the ship. In ports with large tidal variations, operations must often wait for favorable conditions. Extending ramp length can reduce slope but significantly increases vessel cost.

  2. Low space utilization
    Unlike cellular container ships, Ro-Ro ships cannot stack containers vertically. Containers must remain on chassis, meaning only one layer is carried on deck. As a result, cargo hold utilization is limited to 30–40%, which severely affects overall transport economics.

  3. High construction cost
    Ro-Ro ships require specialized structures and equipment for cargo handling, making their cost nearly double that of cellular container ships. For example, one imported Ro-Ro vessel cost around $1,917 per deadweight ton, compared with $807 for a container ship and $585–610 for a multipurpose vessel at the same time.

Why Ro-Ro Container Ships Remain a Supplement

Although Ro-Ro vessels offer unmatched flexibility and speed, their high cost, low cargo space utilization, and sensitivity to tidal conditions reduce their economic appeal. In most cases, they serve as a supplementary transport mode alongside cellular container ships, rather than a mainstream alternative.

They are mainly used in niche applications such as: